This is my 2nd time ordering these pills. I took them 2yrs ago and dropped 20lbs. I have about 10lbs I'm trying to get rid of that is being stubborn so I knew immediately I was ordering these again. I am 32 and at this point anything unhealthy that I eat sticks to me like glue. These pills are NO JOKE. My advice is if you have never taken these before take just 1 pill in the morning with breakfast and do NOT drink extra caffeine. It will make you all shakey and possibly sick. Build up a tolerance as you go and drink a lot of water throughout the day. If you do this, eat healthy and exercise 30 mins a day you will drop weight like crazy. Remember though don't take two in the morning and one 4 hours later or you will be sick as a dog and think your heart will explode. They uplift your mood and get the job done. I will never try any other diet pill. Thank you high tech pharmaceuticals for making a pill that works! (Posted on 7/16/2016)
Rossignol et al (2009) concluded that "[g]iven the positive findings of this study, and the shortage of proven treatments for individuals with autism, parents who pursue hyperbaric treatment for their child with autism can be assured that it is a safe treatment modality at the pressure used in this study ( atm), and that it may improve certain autistic behaviors. Further studies are needed by other investigators to confirm these findings; we are aware of several other planned or ongoing studies of hyperbaric treatment in children with autism. However, in light of the positive results of this study and those of several previous studies, the use of hyperbaric treatment appears to be a promising treatment for children with autism".
74 Secondly, this case is yet another of those all too frequent cases where, in order to impose a proper sentence on the Respondent, this Court has had to choose between the unfairness of unequal treatment of co-offenders and the injustice to the community of acquiescing in a second manifestly inadequate sentence because the Director of Public Prosecutions, while appealing in the case of the Respondent elected, or was not sufficiently organised, to appeal in the case of a co-offender. As the Respondent and Sayadi were both arrested on the same day and sentenced by the same judge some 2 weeks apart it is inconceivable that the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions was not aware of the relationship between them. In that situation it is impossible to see any rational explanation for the bringing of an appeal in one case and not in the other.